Search
5 posts

gravatar

#1. Re: DDM Guild - Custom Miniature by StephenGRoy, responding to DagaronGo to post

DAMN GREYHAZE

That second sketch is $%ING Awesome!!

I want one!

gravatar

#2. Re: EC 1.0 Week 203 - Restless Dead by Adkainen, responding to KaeZarGo to post

[quote]
[b]KaeZar said:[/b]
Orgg (Half-Orc Druid)
[b]Warlord Leveling:[/b] CFX [warband building: Caotic humans are legal in this warband][/quote]

I think we have only allowed the type of the base creature for WB-Building CFXs, so it must be “Chaotic Half-Orcs” or another CFX if i am not wrong (not 100%sure for the new warlords)

gravatar

Has all the cake

Administrator

#3. Re: Paint quality and assumptions by ktatroe, responding to sienarGo to post

sienar said:
There is nothing assumed about the rule of halves. It’s a known method for estimating costs for books.

I can say with absolute certainty that “half, then half again” is as solid a rule of thumb as is possible to have.

There’s some variation, based on specific publishers (I suspect, for example, that Scholastic gets better than 25% of cover cost from its distributors for the Harry Potter books), but not much.

The game trade is slightly different (game trade distributors take a larger chunk in many cases, and retailers take a smaller chunk—25% to 30% instead of 50% of MSRP), and a select few game manufacturers are able to direct ship, so they get a bit more of the % for those sales (though when they sell to booksellers and retail chains, that’s generally through Ingram and the like, where they get book %s), but it’s still a reasonable rule of thumb there, if with a bit more deviation.

gravatar

Has all the cake

Administrator

#4. Re: Paint quality and assumptions by ktatroe, responding to sienarGo to post

I can say with absolute certainty that “half, then half again” is as solid a rule of thumb as is possible to have.

There’s some variation, based on specific publishers (I suspect, for example, that Scholastic gets better than 25% of cover cost from its distributors for the Harry Potter books), but not much.

The game trade is slightly different (game trade distributors take a larger chunk in many cases, and retailers take a smaller chunk—25% to 30% instead of 50% of MSRP), and a select few game manufacturers are able to direct ship, so they get a bit more of the % for those sales (though when they sell to booksellers and retail chains, that’s generally through Ingram and the like, where they get book %s), but it’s still a reasonable rule of thumb there, if with a bit more deviation.

gravatar

Has all the cake

Administrator

#5. Paint Quality and Assumptions (cont'd) by ktatroe

I can say with absolute certainty that “half, then half again” is as solid a rule of thumb as is possible to have.

There’s some variation, based on specific publishers (I suspect, for example, that Scholastic gets better than 25% of cover cost from its distributors for the Harry Potter books), but not much.

The game trade is slightly different (game trade distributors take a larger chunk in many cases, and retailers take a smaller chunk—25% to 30% instead of 50% of MSRP), and a select few game manufacturers are able to direct ship, so they get a bit more of the % for those sales (though when they sell to booksellers and retail chains, that’s generally through Ingram and the like, where they get book %s), but it’s still a reasonable rule of thumb there, if with a bit more deviation.

Search
5 posts

Today on Hordelings

2007 Fundraiser

295 of 1,000 maps sold
Donate and get yours today!
Clarifications and errata

Active Forum Threads

Move [18]

More Active Topics

March
  M T W T F S S
W1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
W2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
W3 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
W4 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
W5 29 30 31